Good Evening all.
analyzed in the CGIL modules SR41 we noticed that we are trying to clarify discrepancies with the study Martinoia and company (which he was involved in drafting the forms, and then the part of the layoff which is headed by INPS) -
Specifically, the salary that you will find as the sum of the first two lines of your payroll should be the figure reported on the forms SR41 (BOX 7 - PAY MONTHLY) - this detail was confirmed by the same studio Martinoia when we met him a few weeks ago. So it's not though. So we are trying to contact the firm to understand where these figures come out. - We hope to have answers soon.
Many of you have already reported discrepancies regarding the dates of employment shown in MOD.SR41 - the same speech above: we await clarification Martinoia study. -
Flight Fund: For those who do have doubts about the calculations since they come from specific case studies such as returns from Maternity Leave in the last 12 months - Maternity games in the last 12 months, expectations, long-term illness, topping causes etc etc, you Please send URGENTLY (in case you had not already done so) your historical perspective that will subject the attention of experts in the bottom flight - so that there will be no errors. -
More Details: Of course, please check that all the other data reported sull'SR41 are correct (see IBAN code etc. ..)
unemployment benefits: It seems that some of you (temporary) were able to resolve the situation in the wrong amounts - also await other feedback. Thank you for your cooperation.
At this annex also the two requests to meet with the Commissioner to CGIs and EXCEPTION IN POST-MEETING January 10
the moment is everything. We would be
,
RRSSAA FILT CGIL
analyzed in the CGIL modules SR41 we noticed that we are trying to clarify discrepancies with the study Martinoia and company (which he was involved in drafting the forms, and then the part of the layoff which is headed by INPS) -
Specifically, the salary that you will find as the sum of the first two lines of your payroll should be the figure reported on the forms SR41 (BOX 7 - PAY MONTHLY) - this detail was confirmed by the same studio Martinoia when we met him a few weeks ago. So it's not though. So we are trying to contact the firm to understand where these figures come out. - We hope to have answers soon.
Many of you have already reported discrepancies regarding the dates of employment shown in MOD.SR41 - the same speech above: we await clarification Martinoia study. -
Flight Fund: For those who do have doubts about the calculations since they come from specific case studies such as returns from Maternity Leave in the last 12 months - Maternity games in the last 12 months, expectations, long-term illness, topping causes etc etc, you Please send URGENTLY (in case you had not already done so) your historical perspective that will subject the attention of experts in the bottom flight - so that there will be no errors. -
More Details: Of course, please check that all the other data reported sull'SR41 are correct (see IBAN code etc. ..)
unemployment benefits: It seems that some of you (temporary) were able to resolve the situation in the wrong amounts - also await other feedback. Thank you for your cooperation.
At this annex also the two requests to meet with the Commissioner to CGIs and EXCEPTION IN POST-MEETING January 10
the moment is everything. We would be
,
RRSSAA FILT CGIL
0 comments:
Post a Comment